Std rates gay vs straight
Home / gay topics / Std rates gay vs straight
As a result, LGBTQ+ individuals may be less likely to seek out healthcare services, leading to undiagnosed and untreated STDs.
Additionally, socioeconomic factors such as poverty and lack of access to healthcare can further exacerbate the disparities in STD rates among LGBTQ+ populations. Many LGBTQ+ individuals report feeling judged or mistreated by healthcare providers, which can deter them from seeking care.
Little JW. Gonorrhea: Update. Each citizen is given a unique civil registration number which can be linked to comprehensive databases of microbiological test results. doi:10.1097/00007435-199704000-00002
26. While the average STI testing rate in people some time before starting PrEP was in the region of 50 tests per 100 person years (i.e.
Age-Specific prevalence of anal human papillomavirus infection in HIV-negative sexually active men who have sex with men: the EXPLORE study. By expanding healthcare coverage, increasing funding for STD prevention programs, and providing culturally competent care, we can help reduce the burden of STDs on LGBTQ+ individuals and improve health outcomes for this population.
doi:10.1111/andr.12078
28. All but eight participants started on a daily PrEP regimen. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. This fear can prevent individuals from seeking out the care they need, putting them at a higher risk for undiagnosed and untreated STDs.
In addition to fear of discrimination, stigma surrounding LGBTQ+ identities can also impact access to STD testing and treatment.
By creating safe and inclusive healthcare environments, providing education and resources, and addressing social determinants of health, we can work towards reducing the disparities in STD rates among LGBTQ+ individuals. This implies an unadjusted annual incidence rate of 35 per 100 person-years before PrEP and 81 per 100 afterwards (as other studies have shown, this does not mean that all participants had an 81% chance of acquiring an STI while on PrEP: some may have had no STIs and others may have had repeated episodes.)
This means that the frequency of STI diagnoses (the Incidence Rate Ratio or IRR) was 2.15 times greater after PrEP than before, both for all STIs and for each individual STI.
More news from Denmark
However, people took three times as many STI tests after starting PrEP than before: in total, 7936 before PrEP but 23,654 after it.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):65-73. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70156-7
4. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70994-6
Danish study finds that STI rates in gay men increase before they start PrEP, not after
A Danish study which was able to chart the annual incidence of the three bacterial STIs, chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis, in people attending sexual health clinics both before and after they started PrEP has found that they had more than twice as many (115% more) STI diagnoses while on PrEP than they had some time before starting it.
However it also found that much of this increase in diagnoses was due to increased testing.
Whether this matters, with two conditions that may not only be asymptomatic but also self-limiting (as a previous Dutch modelling study has explored) is a matter of public health debate.
The study “does not imply that PrEP causes risk compensation,” say the authors. AIDS Lond Engl.